The trial of Lindsay Clancy is expected to focus heavily on psychological expert testimony, as noted by a psychology blog. This approach suggests that jurors will rely on specialists to differentiate between evidence that is credible and potentially misleading. The article emphasizes that there won't be an overwhelming number of witnesses, which could make the impact of this type of specialized analysis even more pronounced. Psychology Today [1] does not provide specific details about the expected number of witnesses or their nature, but it highlights the importance of psychological expert testimony in determining the outcome of the trial. This approach indicates a neutral stance on the case's proceedings and outcomes. Lindsay Clancy is facing charges related to her alleged role in a financial fraud scheme [2]. The sources do not specify which side (plaintiff or defendant) these charges are against, nor do they provide any details about the specific allegations. However, the focus on psychological expert testimony suggests that the defense might be using this approach as part of their strategy.