Baltimore's municipal utility has been allowing BGE, the city-owned energy company, to profit from work on city conduits. A proposal currently under review by the city's spending board aims to change this arrangement and return responsibility for these projects back to the city itself. [1] The move comes after a series of disputes over BGE's role in managing conduit repairs, which are critical for maintaining the city's infrastructure. Critics argue that allowing BGE to profit from these operations has led to inefficiencies and higher costs for taxpayers. [2] The proposal seeks to address these issues by ensuring that all conduits remain under the control of the municipal utility, thereby reducing potential conflicts of interest. [1] Supporters of the plan believe it will lead to better oversight and more efficient use of funds allocated for conduit repairs. They argue that this approach would prevent BGE from using its position to profit at the expense of taxpayers. [3] On the other hand, some opponents of the proposal suggest that returning control could result in delays or reduced quality of work due to a lack of expertise within the municipal utility. [2] The city's spending board will decide whether to approve this initiative and return conduit repairs back under the purview of the municipal utility. If approved, it would represent a significant shift in how Baltimore manages its infrastructure projects.